book exodus summary
before summarizing any book we should inspect several things.
we were born into a world where we see a "holy bible" people tell us that it is a good holy book but how can we check?
people tell us the bible is good which contains BOTH the book jeremia and the book exodus and we believe HUMANS that both are good and if we do not know the CONTENTS we might never notice the problems. so i will save you time to select the important sources.
first a STORY:when i was in the jew orthodox school i was troubled by the number of years in the exodus story. in NINTH grade we were taught that when the rabbis translated the bible to greek they made a few changes which were listed in the talmud so we know any OTHER difference between septagint which is considered good in talmud mgila preserved the original except that list of changes. for example sep. preserved the years until a father birthed a son that was not a change but preserved the original, for example adam two hundred thirty, so the book genesis of jews with a different number is a forgery.
one of the changes was "the number of years in egypt and other lands 430 four hundred thirty years" but why not accept the book of exodus as true? the rabbi explained that sources wrote 210 years matching a talmudic tradition but if so that would mean the book of exodus was false as they needed to alter. i challenged how can they reject the word of god "in egypt 430 years". the rabbi answered only oral tradition guides interpretation and that numbers were exagerated by solomon and also here.
later a student showed me the year numbers of the levi generations that were less than 430 and rashi there and in talmud aboda zara points out the difference so the bible itself indicated less than 400… still an additional source that does not match is simply a CONTRADICTION since it said "in egypt" as they needed to change. so under the rabbis i believed the bible "exagerated" both the years between egypt and solomon as they explained exageration and the same doubling the years in egypt it was an exageration doubling to teach the message suffering seemed like 430 years because the agony of even a few minutes seems very long more than usual time. the story continues…
STORY: later i searched other religions and asked a christian leader about this issue. he directed me to "fast and pray for understanding" i challenged but we pray and "dont get ALL that we ask"? so he said well if you fast that strengthens the power of prayer and if it is about understanding the prophecy then you will certainly get answered as written "ask anything in my name" meaning anything about understanding the word of god gaurunteed to get an answer.
so i said we can BOTH fast and pray and see if we get the same message? sucker! he agreed to fast but the next day when we met and i asked if he fasted he said he had no doubt because academic wrote like the rabbis.
however i got a message that matches sources so that validated the message and as above ask anything and you will GET so i got. it is not from my mind and it does match the other books.
STORY: i prayed and asked please teach me the understanding and meaning that the years of levi are less years and the years "in egypt are more years" which is true and what is the meaning? the message was "the book is not holy feel the difference and in those moments i felt several pages as guided which were holy and which were not jeremia and isaiah wer eholy but exodus and others were not" i prayed more but how long were jews in egypt? the answer was neither the jews were not in egypt so the book of exodus was not from me and is neither true nor holy in contarast to jeremia and look jeremia said i did not command sacrifice that is my message but exodus can cause error that i commanded sacrifice which is false necause i sent jeremia to fix the error and tell the truth not command so that book exodus is false and not holy."
this message matches sources because "jesus NEVER said by name he quoted book exodus" for example matthew 22,32 is SIMILAR to book exodus but he never mentioned it by name where his source was so only that detail is good but a claim about "the book exodus" lacks any foundation, he never taught that the book was good. in fact the qoute similar to genesis differed from jew genesis so he was not quoting jew genesis that book we only think is holy because of human teachers but jesus never said those two books were true instead the opposite he did not say the source by name and the qoute differed because not genesis of jews. in contrast jeremia WAS mentioned by name nearby in mat. 27, 9 jeremia the prophet by name this suppoerted that the message was not only not my own mind but matched the sources not a foreign idea instead those who included exodus baselessly when jesus did not say it by name cannot indclude exodus. in fact exodus is a different religion than the prophet jeemia who was mentioned by name and taught god did not command sacrifice since that is true we can easily identify that exodus can cause error that did command and this is an error because truly did not and the claim to include exodus book is baseless except the details a few that jesus actualy said that are the same in both sources.
but what aboutthe time in egypt the answer was neither because the book exodus is not from me the story in acts was a symbolic parable but ttruly the jews did not go to egypt nor exit.
now that we are warned the book exodus is a different religion than jeremia and that despite willingness to accept either 430 or less like the list of levi generations the message was neither because the book is not from me but a different repigion so we can just summarise briefly what is inside instead of reading a bad book that can cause errors.
the first part described slavery:
PART ONE chapters one to 11:
entering egypt, moses fled and saw a message. the amazing plagues… WAIT…
note: that part is very tempting but the book is a foregn religion as indicated by jeremia's true message. also even those parallel descriptions of each plague do not match each other and this not a problem because only a book from god can be expected to tell accurately but not the book exodus not from god and not holy but a different religion as indicated by the Content of sacrifices noticeably different from god who sent a message by jeremia that any such message is not from me i never commanded sacrifices so you eat the burnt offerings see for yourself in jeremia 7.
so the message to me matched the sources it is not a new message but a selection to emphasis certain parts. so the claim we hear that jeremia is good is confirmed in matthew chapter 27 by name he is a prophet so that claim has a basis in contrast to those who claim book exodus is good yet jesus "never said by name book exodus" and even the quotes similar to it are without name he never said which source so only that detail quoted is good and preserved but no basis for the whole book. similarly jude quoted enoch that does not mean that enoch is a holy book and indeed enoch was not included despite jude quoted from it only the one detail is good not the whole book, same about a detail if exodus had a similar idea that matches then that detail is supported but not the book so we see the message matched the sources.
once we know jeremia was a true prophet obedience is to accept that god did not command sacrifice and therefore not be fooled by a book that can cause an error that he did so not accept book exodus nor similar books. instead the story in acts was only a symbolic legend.
DETAILS in part one so you know the summary instead of reading the book exodus that can cause errors. chapter 2 they prayed, moses survived by floating in a river, by the burning bush moses argued with gods message "they wont believe me". moses warned paro age 80 wait! note: they prayed for saving and not get it instead suffered 80 years prayer does not help… unless asking for understanding gods word as above ask anything in my name. king refused so amazing plagues hit. note: the story of locusts is certainly after icy hail in the story so delayed between the time when the barley was dry until exit so this conflicted later when passover is by barley harvest they had not left then according to exodus but that is not a problem because the book is not from god.
ten plagues each one with two or three versions that do not match. could edit and blend all details into one prophecy and briefly it happened" but instead different versions because not from god who knew whatever happened and in this case nation not actualy in egypt nor exit nor plagues just a symbol in book acts.
PART 2 exiting saved
summary: the exit according to rabbi count: the year 2000 was called 5760 minus 2000=3760 minus 2448 according to rashi is 1312bc this is known to be false and rabbi wrong due to mesa in 843 bc and mentioned in book kings by jehospat=generations after solomon plus 480 years is 843+480=1323 even without the kings after solomon is too long and including until josapat way too long so the rabbis were forced to interpret book kings exagerated as above. but if kings true then the rabbis were wrong both about exageration and their numbers. whatever exodus symbolized was 480 years before solomon. still the numbers between mesa=mesha until nebucadnezer are flawed so book kings ALSO not from god who knew the true numbers. the book is separated from god and not holy and only the part same as book isaiah is good not the whole book.
how did the first born die? two versions "i and not my agent" as emphasized in jew ceremony or in exodus gods angel no problem! the book is not from god.
what about the children who did not sin nor cruel or were compelled by adults? do they deserve punishment? exodus said EVERY first born god hit or an angel hit which is true? neither. the contradiction and th etradition i and not an agent indicate another hint that this book is not from god who knew which, as we saw in other examples not only caused by this problem of children but god certainly did not kill every first born including children not even by sending an agent.
the claim that he did is in a book that was never included by jesus.
SUMMARY: the israelites exited they crossed a sea led by pillars of cloud and fire. that is the exciting detail preserved here so you wont read a bad book that can cause errors. what did they eat "food from the sky" is that to hide that they stole from travelers or raided border villages? the israelites truly never left the area of the jordan river until later.
details: exodus claimed they put blood on the door hinting if a jew did not he was hit same as egyptian however isaia wrote a message from god i did not want blood in past tense not only that sinful generation of isaia but past so this also warned us book exodus is a different religion than the prophets.
the egyptian army drowned. hmm why dont divers pull up an ARMY worth of many swords and spears from whichever sea? no problem the book is not from god. if they find a pile of swords it can be interpreted that a transport ship carrying swords sunk but even the religious christians never bothered to look for swords in the sea floor.
summary" the israelites sang a song preserving some ancient grammar but the song described in josephus differed so the original was lost and replaced but this song in book exodus is a fraud mislabel.
amalek attacked but moses raised his hands and the israel soldiers won. here a christian summary accepted 430 years not exageration but as above the generation of levi challenge that and since god knew this book exodus with both conflicting numbers is separate from god and not holy.
part THREE
relationship: god spoke from fire. rules and laws in future grammar not truly commands and a different religions laws the one with sacrifices which differed from the prophets religion.
two versions of building a worship tent filling many chapters with the tent that contained contents. consistently this religion has two altars but that is a different religion than jeremi who said i did not command and from isaia that said i did not want blood even in past.
details: i as a father can sell my daughter to be a maid servant… yay? do i rejoice at my god given privilige to sell my daughter? i want my daughter protected where i can gaurd her until she is independent no problem this is the religion with scarifices that differed from the religion of the prophets truly not command sacrifice nor allow selling daughter.
two versions of choosing moses brother as family boost which we know is immoral. one here and one in the following book.
in summary we can see many problems that are not a challenge to the true religion of the prophets because including exodus was baseless and wrong.
faith rhymes 