-
original scripture before rabbi interfered
gospel john [who got the date correct] and paul preserved the original scripture before the rabbis chose different books with a similar common source
instead of reading the rabbi version i gathered the original Paul of benjamin preserved
scripture [note no book title and not order of jew book] Elias about Israel, saying, "Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life." God answered him "I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal, law do not covet, written zeal for your house will [future not jew book] fill me.written: “For your sake we face death all day long; we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hatedScripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earthscripture “They divided my clothes among them and cast lots for my garment.Isaiah “I was found by those who did not seek me; I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me.”written: “Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles; I will sing the praises of your name. written, The just shall live by faith.written: “God’s name is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you [also not match either similar rabbi versionwritten: “So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge
written: “There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one" “Their throats are open graves [plural not rabbi book] their tongues practice deceit.” “The poison of vipers is on their lips.” “Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness.” “Their feet are swift to shed blood ruin and misery mark their ways, and the way of peace they do not know. “There is no fear of God before their eyes" til r4 scripture, Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousnessdavid [v] “Blessed are those whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered. Blessed is the one whose sin the Lord will never count against them."written: “I have made you a father of many nationsSay not Who shall ascend into heaven? [note: source is not jew deuteronmy that differed, "ascend for us to heaven" but the original scripture before rabbis corrupted] Who shall descend into the deep? The word is near thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart."Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you. [them in rabbi corruption]written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people.cwritten: “He catches the wise in their craftines" no title, “The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile."written, "Thou shalt not muzzle "the mouth 1cor9.9" of the bull that treadeth. note: contrast the law of Moses refered to in 1cor9.9 is NOT the similar jew dueteronomy that differs also lacking theo and elsewhere specified moses commanded in both nt n even dt33 too. called "scripture" 1 tim.5.18.written, "Cursed is one who not does all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." see gal. 3. 10book hebrews is not in canons nor codex ancient 300's also not iren nor marc the heretic. similarly james not in original canons. not only not m heretic but even iren lacked. source welch also 2 peter not iren n eus disputed n not mura canon also in lao council revelation is heresy
-
bad translation in bible
orthodox rabbis damaged much harm. here i exhibit some comparative translations for example rabbis inaccurately translated "his, he lay his" wrongly writing you in jps version +other flaws
r: AND the Lord called to Moshe, and spoke to him out of the Tent of Meeting, saying, " did not translated hebrew which has: He called to Moshe; God said to him, from the tent of meeting, saying, 2, "Speak to Israelites; you will say to them, "A person, that will bring, from you an offering to God, from the herd, from the cattle or from the flock, you will bring your offering:" also here rabbis moved herd to second not matched hebrew+"Speak to the children of Yisra᾽el, and say to them, If any man of you bring an offering to the Lord, of the cattle shall you bring your offering, of the herd, and of the flock." 3 If an elevation offering is his offering from the cattle, you shall make your offering a male without blemish. You shall bring it to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, for acceptance in your behalf before God. +"If his offering is a burnt-offering of cattle he shall bring an unblemished male; to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting he shall bring it, that it be favorably accepted from him before god y
also genesis compare, in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." +"At first, Elohim formed the sky and the land". 2, "And the land was a wasteland and empty; darkness on the surface of the deep; the Spirit of God is hovering on the face of the water." +"The land was destroyed [and destroyed]. Darkness on the surface of the deep water. A wind of Elohim blows on the surface of the water 3, "Elohim said, "Light will be." Light was."+ "God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light." 4, Elohim saw the light that [was] good; Elohim separated between the light and between the darkness. +"God saw that the light was good, and God separated the light from the darkness."also genesis, beginning usualy connected but here not so first is better but not first as if nothing before but at first
wemust stop trusting rabbis who nevercearned trust n worse exhibited unreliable so we must ask as usual "did jesus ever say by name thet books genesis was good? he never said by name so we must not include in holy bible with teal prophecy of jeremia such regular or unreliable books. only the bits echoed in new tesrament those bits are the preserved old testsment. not any book that jesus never said by title.
-
story, for SOLVING the conflicted versions
here i will provide the solution for conflicted versions by telling a true recent story of criticism
STORY in february i discovered that a student acquaintance had been a Christian but rejected it. before he revealed his past he mentioned the trinity and i said "the trinity is one god 3 persons" not more than one god
he argued that he "knew unitarian but trinitarian is 3 gods" but i corrected him that even trinity say the creed one god
quote: " cATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: The Athanasian Creed
Catholic Faith "we worship one God in Trinity" adding "all one equal glory" so even the Trinity is one god monotheism ethe next meeting he disclosed that he left Christian, so i asked what "flaw did you find" again he repeated that trinity was polytheism, despite already saying that "if jesus is less than god that is unitarian and again i said even trinity say "one god
he argued that is not a real one since it has 3 persons i let him have that despite "all equal same glory" it is the same one in different appearances apparitions
i asked if he noticed the flaw in the versions of the crucified he replied that the witnesses conflicted each other so false witness because one version said before sunrise and tyhe ither after and since that is easy ro distinguish the witnesses conflicted like false witnesses so he claimed
however i was ready by asking a question "which day did romans kill jesus
when he said friday i rephrased " was he killed at the time of passover offering or after eati g the offering
ex christian knew the answer to THAT saying "jesus was claimed as the passover" so he prefered the version in john which is the SOLUTION to his previous complaints
the version in mark is the problem see mark 16,2 when the sun had risen and in the same version mark chapter 14 verses 12, 16, 17 we see they "prepared passover" on the day of preparing passover and the evening after preparing it the story continued that the next morning he went to pilate after the passover offering so that solved all the problems
in contrast john said the one who SAW that while dark found the cave empty not like mark when sun rose wrongly in mark which had jesus not being the passover but dark
similarly john said in john 18,28 the morning of pilate was BEFORE the time of passover so john not only matched that jesus was the passover as ex correctlt said, but he was the one who saw unlike mark who had the wrong day after passover the error of mark said after sun rose but the correct version that he was the pasover and by pilate before the passover as above 18,28 beforw wating passover not like errors in unreliable mark so that solved all 3 problems
all 3 reasons for leaving christian faith defend each other
he complained about trinity while knowing the option of unitarian he could be unitarian christian but still he complained that mark said after sunrise while himself saying that jesus was the passover so the version in john was true so mark is the unreliable one so not a challenge to john on both the dark morning story and the death at the time of oassover not after we see the ex christian had all the information to answer his contradiction that only john was true but nark unreliable sinc he knew jesus was the passover but he was fooled to use unreliable mark as if it challenged the witness who saw that is john
his reaso s to exit christian are each solved he could be unitarian jnstead of trinity abd he knew joh was correct not mark so the one KNOWN to be unreliable that is mark version is not a challenge to the good version in john
that is the solution presented as a story
-
worshipped
note: two different poems from sadness to hope to fun
a
My lord Jesus, Odd-oan shelly,, God sent you down from up above,, to clean our sins and die for me,, down from heaven, with God's great love
where is that love? when we feel pain
we supplicate, how long the wait?
i beg with prayers. Will You accept?
we suffer with a heavy weight.words can't describe many troubles
our lives are filled with suffering
despite abandoning body
king. for our souls you are caring.in your holy sight: none are clean
not even one in this low world
rejecting faith is filthy sin
by grace like sand becomes a pearlmessiah your death, served to clean
our many guilts our many sins
your death then life, for everything
our death then life, our hope beginsafter we die, we'll get revived
not by earning, only God's grace
please also help, our body too
many troubles and pains we facesave us from all troubles and pains
from sickness and complications
pour your kindness and healing too
we believers are your nationwe gather here and we study
holy messages and stories
we need so much of your kindness
our life service is your glory.b after prayer we hope and even have fun
after worshipping we have fun, we'll enjoy time ’til it is done
at its end we will all be gone
same as darkness gets swapped each dawn -
my life for jesus , poems
a, I put my life in Jesus hands, God we beg hosanna from you, we sanctified our lives to serve, and Your love and Your grace are true
Jesus you are master of all, and you're also our master too, our lives are yours. with our full hearts, hosanna hosanna by you
b, Jesus freed
by Jesus believers are free
just his name, no other can be
my master you are "a and z"
the "start and end" of our study.Jesus, his name can heal and save
spirits of evil it defeats
for inner calm and nations too
the solution for all real peaceanybody on land or sea
under stars or beneath the sky
can accept the grace by belief
for life not death, when bodies die. (source john 3 and cor. 1,12)love flows from the Father's throne
God's glorious beauty: our aim
love flows from the Father's heart
by Jesus by jesus, his name -
fixing a spirit song
Come you glory of god. we beg You: fill this place
Spirit of God, guide my soul, glory of God show your face
we invite you knowing you will come
welcome here, welcome here, oh glory of god
welcome here, welcome here, oh glory of god
-
Salvation poem
salvation through Jesus set us all free
Your grace flows to us we are Your body
you showed Your Heart cares for humanity
we serve with faith to bring you more glory
we live to know your word and to find truth
prophecies are your holy word we learn
and stories and lessons to guide our hearts
we are waiting: for Your Kingdom we yearn
now we see the suffering everywhere
we are praying Your Kingdom will be shown
we study and teach your lessons at home
also to others seeds of faith are sown
subdue evil spirits by Jesus name
a leader may not lead without one wife
not by Mary but one powerful name.
God offered all the earth eternal Life -
I know Jesus
Intro: this poem was inspired by "Kingdom Come" Song by Hillsong, album unitedthat song began with the important lesson that "the opportunity for US to reach the divine, shows your love now to us" a continuing involved relationship from past that never stopped and will never leave.
song: i know by pastor tal
___
I know Your love came with Jesus, it will not ever leave, the only way to you is faith, for all who do believe
we will still have your gift of life, after our bodies die your grace is great a gift not earned, your spirit is nearby
In us, dwells your Holy spirit, its symbol was a bird, when it came down upon jesus, who taught your Holy word
your holy spirit is our guide, teaches your lesson: true, we ask for guidance in our lives, We live mainly for you
u.
-
book exodus summary
book exodus summary
before summarizing any book we should inspect several things.
we were born into a world where we see a "holy bible" people tell us that it is a good holy book but how can we check?
people tell us the bible is good which contains BOTH the book jeremia and the book exodus and we believe HUMANS that both are good and if we do not know the CONTENTS we might never notice the problems. so i will save you time to select the important sources.
first a STORY:when i was in the jew orthodox school i was troubled by the number of years in the exodus story. in NINTH grade we were taught that when the rabbis translated the bible to greek they made a few changes which were listed in the talmud so we know any OTHER difference between septagint which is considered good in talmud mgila preserved the original except that list of changes. for example sep. preserved the years until a father birthed a son that was not a change but preserved the original, for example adam two hundred thirty, so the book genesis of jews with a different number is a forgery.
one of the changes was "the number of years in egypt and other lands 430 four hundred thirty years" but why not accept the book of exodus as true? the rabbi explained that sources wrote 210 years matching a talmudic tradition but if so that would mean the book of exodus was false as they needed to alter. i challenged how can they reject the word of god "in egypt 430 years". the rabbi answered only oral tradition guides interpretation and that numbers were exagerated by solomon and also here.
later a student showed me the year numbers of the levi generations that were less than 430 and rashi there and in talmud aboda zara points out the difference so the bible itself indicated less than 400… still an additional source that does not match is simply a CONTRADICTION since it said "in egypt" as they needed to change. so under the rabbis i believed the bible "exagerated" both the years between egypt and solomon as they explained exageration and the same doubling the years in egypt it was an exageration doubling to teach the message suffering seemed like 430 years because the agony of even a few minutes seems very long more than usual time. the story continues…
STORY: later i searched other religions and asked a christian leader about this issue. he directed me to "fast and pray for understanding" i challenged but we pray and "dont get ALL that we ask"? so he said well if you fast that strengthens the power of prayer and if it is about understanding the prophecy then you will certainly get answered as written "ask anything in my name" meaning anything about understanding the word of god gaurunteed to get an answer.
so i said we can BOTH fast and pray and see if we get the same message? sucker! he agreed to fast but the next day when we met and i asked if he fasted he said he had no doubt because academic wrote like the rabbis.
however i got a message that matches sources so that validated the message and as above ask anything and you will GET so i got. it is not from my mind and it does match the other books.
STORY: i prayed and asked please teach me the understanding and meaning that the years of levi are less years and the years "in egypt are more years" which is true and what is the meaning? the message was "the book is not holy feel the difference and in those moments i felt several pages as guided which were holy and which were not jeremia and isaiah wer eholy but exodus and others were not" i prayed more but how long were jews in egypt? the answer was neither the jews were not in egypt so the book of exodus was not from me and is neither true nor holy in contarast to jeremia and look jeremia said i did not command sacrifice that is my message but exodus can cause error that i commanded sacrifice which is false necause i sent jeremia to fix the error and tell the truth not command so that book exodus is false and not holy."
this message matches sources because "jesus NEVER said by name he quoted book exodus" for example matthew 22,32 is SIMILAR to book exodus but he never mentioned it by name where his source was so only that detail is good but a claim about "the book exodus" lacks any foundation, he never taught that the book was good. in fact the qoute similar to genesis differed from jew genesis so he was not quoting jew genesis that book we only think is holy because of human teachers but jesus never said those two books were true instead the opposite he did not say the source by name and the qoute differed because not genesis of jews. in contrast jeremia WAS mentioned by name nearby in mat. 27, 9 jeremia the prophet by name this suppoerted that the message was not only not my own mind but matched the sources not a foreign idea instead those who included exodus baselessly when jesus did not say it by name cannot indclude exodus. in fact exodus is a different religion than the prophet jeemia who was mentioned by name and taught god did not command sacrifice since that is true we can easily identify that exodus can cause error that did command and this is an error because truly did not and the claim to include exodus book is baseless except the details a few that jesus actualy said that are the same in both sources.
but what aboutthe time in egypt the answer was neither because the book exodus is not from me the story in acts was a symbolic parable but ttruly the jews did not go to egypt nor exit.
now that we are warned the book exodus is a different religion than jeremia and that despite willingness to accept either 430 or less like the list of levi generations the message was neither because the book is not from me but a different repigion so we can just summarise briefly what is inside instead of reading a bad book that can cause errors.
the first part described slavery:
PART ONE chapters one to 11:
entering egypt, moses fled and saw a message. the amazing plagues… WAIT…
note: that part is very tempting but the book is a foregn religion as indicated by jeremia's true message. also even those parallel descriptions of each plague do not match each other and this not a problem because only a book from god can be expected to tell accurately but not the book exodus not from god and not holy but a different religion as indicated by the Content of sacrifices noticeably different from god who sent a message by jeremia that any such message is not from me i never commanded sacrifices so you eat the burnt offerings see for yourself in jeremia 7.
so the message to me matched the sources it is not a new message but a selection to emphasis certain parts. so the claim we hear that jeremia is good is confirmed in matthew chapter 27 by name he is a prophet so that claim has a basis in contrast to those who claim book exodus is good yet jesus "never said by name book exodus" and even the quotes similar to it are without name he never said which source so only that detail quoted is good and preserved but no basis for the whole book. similarly jude quoted enoch that does not mean that enoch is a holy book and indeed enoch was not included despite jude quoted from it only the one detail is good not the whole book, same about a detail if exodus had a similar idea that matches then that detail is supported but not the book so we see the message matched the sources.
once we know jeremia was a true prophet obedience is to accept that god did not command sacrifice and therefore not be fooled by a book that can cause an error that he did so not accept book exodus nor similar books. instead the story in acts was only a symbolic legend.
DETAILS in part one so you know the summary instead of reading the book exodus that can cause errors. chapter 2 they prayed, moses survived by floating in a river, by the burning bush moses argued with gods message "they wont believe me". moses warned paro age 80 wait! note: they prayed for saving and not get it instead suffered 80 years prayer does not help… unless asking for understanding gods word as above ask anything in my name. king refused so amazing plagues hit. note: the story of locusts is certainly after icy hail in the story so delayed between the time when the barley was dry until exit so this conflicted later when passover is by barley harvest they had not left then according to exodus but that is not a problem because the book is not from god.
ten plagues each one with two or three versions that do not match. could edit and blend all details into one prophecy and briefly it happened" but instead different versions because not from god who knew whatever happened and in this case nation not actualy in egypt nor exit nor plagues just a symbol in book acts.
PART 2 exiting saved
summary: the exit according to rabbi count: the year 2000 was called 5760 minus 2000=3760 minus 2448 according to rashi is 1312bc this is known to be false and rabbi wrong due to mesa in 843 bc and mentioned in book kings by jehospat=generations after solomon plus 480 years is 843+480=1323 even without the kings after solomon is too long and including until josapat way too long so the rabbis were forced to interpret book kings exagerated as above. but if kings true then the rabbis were wrong both about exageration and their numbers. whatever exodus symbolized was 480 years before solomon. still the numbers between mesa=mesha until nebucadnezer are flawed so book kings ALSO not from god who knew the true numbers. the book is separated from god and not holy and only the part same as book isaiah is good not the whole book.
how did the first born die? two versions "i and not my agent" as emphasized in jew ceremony or in exodus gods angel no problem! the book is not from god.
what about the children who did not sin nor cruel or were compelled by adults? do they deserve punishment? exodus said EVERY first born god hit or an angel hit which is true? neither. the contradiction and th etradition i and not an agent indicate another hint that this book is not from god who knew which, as we saw in other examples not only caused by this problem of children but god certainly did not kill every first born including children not even by sending an agent.
the claim that he did is in a book that was never included by jesus.
SUMMARY: the israelites exited they crossed a sea led by pillars of cloud and fire. that is the exciting detail preserved here so you wont read a bad book that can cause errors. what did they eat "food from the sky" is that to hide that they stole from travelers or raided border villages? the israelites truly never left the area of the jordan river until later.
details: exodus claimed they put blood on the door hinting if a jew did not he was hit same as egyptian however isaia wrote a message from god i did not want blood in past tense not only that sinful generation of isaia but past so this also warned us book exodus is a different religion than the prophets.
the egyptian army drowned. hmm why dont divers pull up an ARMY worth of many swords and spears from whichever sea? no problem the book is not from god. if they find a pile of swords it can be interpreted that a transport ship carrying swords sunk but even the religious christians never bothered to look for swords in the sea floor.
summary" the israelites sang a song preserving some ancient grammar but the song described in josephus differed so the original was lost and replaced but this song in book exodus is a fraud mislabel.
amalek attacked but moses raised his hands and the israel soldiers won. here a christian summary accepted 430 years not exageration but as above the generation of levi challenge that and since god knew this book exodus with both conflicting numbers is separate from god and not holy.
part THREE
relationship: god spoke from fire. rules and laws in future grammar not truly commands and a different religions laws the one with sacrifices which differed from the prophets religion.
two versions of building a worship tent filling many chapters with the tent that contained contents. consistently this religion has two altars but that is a different religion than jeremi who said i did not command and from isaia that said i did not want blood even in past.
details: i as a father can sell my daughter to be a maid servant… yay? do i rejoice at my god given privilige to sell my daughter? i want my daughter protected where i can gaurd her until she is independent no problem this is the religion with scarifices that differed from the religion of the prophets truly not command sacrifice nor allow selling daughter.
two versions of choosing moses brother as family boost which we know is immoral. one here and one in the following book.
in summary we can see many problems that are not a challenge to the true religion of the prophets because including exodus was baseless and wrong. -
wanda's wedding
wanda's wedding, historical fictionONE1949 december, israel, acre; the wedding was wonderful! one woman named wanda wafa was wearing the color that she had always dreamed for her wedding, bright greenish yellow. her parents' pressure had been huge to wear white same as every wedding but wanda wanted her favorite color and demanded "on my special day i can't be society's slave".wanda had met her husband harold harrison in december 1947 in the same city then called "acre, palestine". his parents called him his jewish name aaron but the british document showed his name harold. his family had fled violence in russia which was also tragicly common in the countries by russia. often the religion caused conflict because the orthodox church separate from catholic and protestant blamed the jews for their part in jesus death… which they wanted and needed for forgiveness of sin, but also wanted to blame jews. similarly polish pogroms perpetrated by catholic church… they would not "forgive" the jews until the popes announcement in the 1960's despite the desire that jesus die for their sins since that was benefit in their faith they should thank the jews for their part in the romans killing jesus which atoned sins but accused "deicide" despite not exactly a god… they weekly announce "one god the father with three persons" which is a "mystery" but one god nonetheless since nobody killed "one god the father" jews only shouting that the romans should kill jesus bot not the father in heaven, and then the romans killed jesus not god the father it was not truly deicide but for catholics three in one is close enough to be deicide but if jesus death was benefit then the jews part was a part of the benefit and even jesus said "forgive them" while on the cross but despite their own book and these three factors the catholic desire to hate jews was stronger than their holy book and even the foundation of their faith that christ died for their sins. these violence events caused death and damage to jews in russia and the region so a man named peter was a refugee fleeing the deadly pogroms and escaped russia into a boat in the black sea. he had bribed a sailor to exchange places so he would work at the sailor's position on the boat and do his jobs until the port in greece.peter paid the sailor and went aboard the deck of the ship wearing the sailor uniform given to him by the one he bribed. for saving his life as a refugee he lied and showed the sailors paper which lacked a picture and was allowed on board for the job. peter worked hard and beyed the captain's commands and crew commands too. he frequently made the motion of the cross the way the sailor had taught him so they would not suspect he was from a jewish family.the slow journey went to port after port many ports along the west coast of the black sea but peter stayed on and worked. obviously much cargo was unloaded and loaded on the ship at each port. the ship passed between a narrow strait and reached the nile sea called mediteranean which is greek for med=middle between terra=land between the lands. every sea is med-terra like the adriatic sea and north sea and baltic sea so the name was the local greek name.when the boat arrived in a greek port peter carried cargo off from the ship ashore… but undressed in the shack. he had stuffed a long sleep gown into a bag he carried so he put on the long robe. he added the cloth turban and walked out asking "mosk? mosk?" which nobody understood.the weekly wages he had earned were with him so he had purchased a ticket to the ancient land of king solomon then named israel, but at the time of the trip named palestine due to the roman control and the name stayed for centuries. as the sun set he kneeled and pretended to pray to alla despite his rejection of any religious book. he looked like a muslim in the gown and prayed five times a day.after a short trip of around 8 days he came to acre, palestine. he continued the muslim act by joining the muslim community in acre which was pronounced akka in arabic. he was offered a bride as common in that era and the muslim culture so he wed her in a muslim ceremony with the qadi.peter had a daughter by his wife and she was palestinian by birth. when she reached age 14, peter arranged his daughter's marriage to a jew from europe. he prefered a jew due to his own true secret family. he used the muslim authority to arrange her wedding as he desired. their daughter, peter's granddaughter, was a jewish palestinian due to her father. she changed her name to wanda and when she met hari in 1947, they started a relationship.a year after the name was "renewed returned refreshed israel" they wed in 1949. when the government changed from british to mixed israeli jew with israeli arab, wanda's ma rejected islam, that was in 1948. she begged her relatives to stay in the same city but they obeyed the arab leaders and left the british borders that had been established in the 1920's between british palestine and egypt when egypt was granted independence. similarly the border was set when jordan became independent only jew land needed to wait many years all the 1930's and until 1948 before its independence. just long enough that the jews had nowhere to flee from the nazis. harold claimed that britain had chosen not to enforce the german diarmement and intentionally allowed the nazi to build a vast air force… this would lead to a guaranteed british glorious victory and less jews would wanna come to british palestine because the nazis would obey hitlers well known published book that jews are germs and no crime to kill harmful germs.when the cease fire was established in june 1949 she again sent a telegram to call her relatives back but they wrote that they would not return. the new governemnt did the same as austria and other governments and annuled the ownership of empty homes which was justified as government and even more justified when the "ex-owner" did not come when he was able when hostilities ended in 1949. in 1952, one cousin wrote that he would come, but she replied that they missed their chance in 1949 once hostilities ended they had no excuse "to flee a war zone" and had not returned using that excuse. by 1952, she explained it was too late and certainly later was even later than too late.hari asked his marriage mom why she left islam?she explained that the quran said that the bible of moses was good and the teaching of jesus was light therefore she felt a conflict when the teachers claimed the christian book was corrupt… that violated her commitment to quran and surely alla knew if it was corrupt yet long after the christian version was published the quran wrote it is good so she believed the quran and that the teachers were deceiving her. so she left the lying teachers of islam and went to the light of the book of jesus as she had always believed due to the quran.she notuced that the stories were parallel yet different. when muslims say "jesus never said he was god" they mean in THEIR OWN quran the quote was not included but the christian bible has conflicting sources on this issue.jesus did say he and the father are one… semmingly claiming diviniy and the jews understood that and were furious. she herself was between the two faiths considering jesus spoke often in parable he only meant symbolicly they are one same as usualy spoke parables and symbolic "eat my body" meaning faith.hari challenged her why she did not go to the cathoclic church if she believed in the new testament.she had studied the new testament and knew that biblical peter was married and that bishops must have one wife, in book timothy, not that peter appointed bishops as leader but the community chose someone with one wife, therefore the so-called bishops of catholic were not real bishops without one wife and if a boshop appointed pope no real bishop existed so the appointment of pope was a fraud therefore when the fraud pope appointed by non bishops who did not have one wife, and was not married himself he was not truly the pope with the pope authority to appoint bishops as catholics claim. so the pope was not appointed by a true bishop who could not appoint a pope who was "based on peter" while peter was married in contrast to the pope not matching its own basis of peter… the biblical peter. similarly the appointments by the unappointed pope were not by a true pope so they were not true bishops neither by appointment of pope nor the biblical rule of one wife in paul's letter to timothy which catholics consider holy but ignore.for these reasons she left islam despite its billions of believers who were not troubled by that conflict, or were too scared of their neighbors… she had been scared too even under th ebritish until the liberal israel government. when she left islam she did not accept catholic due to the pope problem not being married to one wife. despite a billion catholics who choose "not to think about the detail of one wife" while their own holy book excluded and prevented bishop and pope unless one wife, they simply dont think about. however she was sincere and respect for holy teaching prevented catholic system of pope and bishop that violated their own holy book.
hari challenged her to do the common baptism of christianity but she had her answer for that too based on her holy book, the holy bible said one baptism. was that water? if so then the verse on colosians all were baptised by spirit is false because one baptism not more. the fact that baptism is by spirit revealed the lie of those who claim baptism is "always water" but in colosians not water so not every… in fact water was before jesus just a custom of john the baptist not the new faith which truly had baptism of spirit and truly one baptism in ephesians so no other. so she did not fit in with the protestants either who teach water baptism despite not obligation, nor necessity same as those on the cross not baptised yet still encouraged… but she felt that added beyond the one baptism as above.hari was impressed by her consistency but did not accept any god. he said "i cannot reach any conclusion so it cannot affect my faith nor actions".TWO1950 january, acre israel. wanda was noticeably pregnant, around 17 weeks but hari did not want the responsibility of a child so he urged his wife to abort the fetus. she beleieved in christianity which taught "sanctity of life" she cannot end the life of the fetus. he tried to pursuade her "it isin your body so you can eject it if you want" she argued even if she wanted that is not realy her body since the baby is a mix of his genetic stuff. they knew that in the 1940's too. hari realized he was wrong the fetus was not her body. hari demanded a divorce… guess what? jesus taught you cannot divorce. in desperation he tried to find a solution he said "your body is a SLAVE to the fetus so "that choice you have for your body." wanda answered that is still not an excuse to kill it. if she agreed to eject it, to free herself she must have arrangements so it will not die but abortion kills it. hari was very angry at religion but his buddy said dont you believe if i broke your window that would be bad. hari agreed that is harm and bad damage. so the pal continued from the fetus perspective you are harming the fetus even a small injury is damage same as evil damage to break a window. so hari simply traveled to haifa. in haifa he could not find work and was expelled from his apartment home. the same night criminals who happened to speak aabic stole his shoes and stabbed the kofir the denier of muhamed and that was the end of harold harrison
the end
faith rhymes 